Lifestyle

Sean has built up a lifestyle for himself and his family through Affiliate Internet Marketing. Before he achieved wealth creation through Internet Marketing Sean Rasmussen was an Electrician, and for a while he also worked as a professional Pearl Diver.

His earnings were good but he wasn’t happy.

He couldn’t be happy in any job that kept him away from his family and his home. He realized that by being away so much he was missing out on seeing his children growing up. He set himself a goal. He gave himself 2 years to be in a position where he can leave his job and double his present income.

Sean planned he could do this by first setting himself up in a home internet marketing business. On the 8th December 2005 Sean Rasmussen was in a position to walk away from his job. He sacked his boss. After leaving his job he then concentrated on wealth creation through Affiliate Internet Marketing.

Sean Rasmussen and his story.

By 2005 he was a full time Affiliate Marketer. By late 2008 he had sold $7,000,000 worth of affiliate products for one company alone.

Tips for success:

• Write down goals and read them once a day.
• Value yourself, rule money or money will rule you.
• See money as energy.
• Market wealth creation products.
• Be passionate and the money will follow.
• Donate 10% of earnings to a charity.

Sean said to experience change he had to initiate change.

Sean’s father Dominic was a fisherman in Denmark and Sweden and he was a wise man. One day he said to Sean:  “Sean, you make money with your mind, not with your hands”  Sean worked on a wealth creation mindset by reading the works of Wallace Wattle, Science Of Getting Rich, and The Secret.

Sean Rasmussen is the founder of Universal Wealth Creation. He has an Internet Marketing Forum webvision2020 and teaches students from all over the world about Affiliate Internet Marketing

Mr McClure founder of UPMART has previously married couples at Common Law. They had a beautiful and memorable ceremony and are still happily married.

Any person who previously has attended a Common Law Course or seminar is eligible for this service for free. To be married by Mr McClure is an honour in itself. Facts are that if a couple marry by the State in Australia they are most likely married pursuant to the federal Marriage Act 1961,

This is true unless a couple:

• was married in another country so therefor by a different set of rules,
• couples are married in Australia and in accordance with common law.

happily married couple

Many couples in recent times are marrying pursuant to the common law. This choice has many advantages over a State law marriage. Common Law Marriages are conducted in Australia and the service is available for free and with a nice marriage certificate. Couples who seek to marry at common law are very happy with the service Mr McClure provides.

It’s no longer only aboriginals in Australia who choose to marry at common law. Non-aboriginal’s also see this marriage as a real option as well. We can all enjoy this freedom and why shouldn’t we?  A Common Law Marriage also provides protection from many problems associated with the Marriage Act 1961.

The protections are at common law and are of a Common Law Marriage and they are blatantly real. Many couples who had previously chosen to marry by the State are now getting a State divorce so that they can then re-marry pursuant to Common Law.

A Common Law Marriage initiatives by Mr McClure of Upmart is normally only open to members who have attend a UCLC. Common Law Marriage instruments are available at no cost, for those couples who have attended a seminar.

Whilst the initiatives of Upmart are pioneering and progressive the members, are by nature generally, conservatively thinkers. couples seeking to be married under common law need to attend a seminar so that they have certain knowledge by understanding the foundation of common law before being married and also before being permitted to use the many other initiatives that Upmart has on offer.

Please leave a comment if you like this article:

The meaning of a Common Law Marriage is that the couple gets married under common law. This means they do not have an obligation to sign a contract with the State.

In a Common Law Marriage a couple can be married by whom ever they choose to marry them. Sometimes it is a family member or it could be a good friend of the family or they can be married by a Common Law Attorney or a Marriage Celebrant.  The couple can still have a memorable ceremony. In actual fact it is a more intimate occasion than having a stranger perform the ceremony.

There are many advantages of a common law marriage and one is that the marriage is not bound by Statute Law.

Having a wedding that is free from the State also means that there will be no need for a costly divorce if the marriage breaks down and they decide to split-up.

There is also no reason why they can’t have a prenuptial  agreement put in place by the couple. They can do this before they marry or anytime after that. They would need to make the agreement in front of family members or someone else of honour and to have someone witnessed the agreement and to have the agreement sealed by a handshake. This agreement may be concerning children,  property or any other arrangements that they what to agree on and to happen if they were to split up.

The married couples don’t need the State to do their thinking for them. We as individuals and members of a community have the capacity to solve our own problems without involving a third party person or entity, such as the State. This also means they do not need a lawyer to settle disputes between the two people who are separating.

Also, it is known that as from 1961 the marriage laws changed so that being married by the State means that a couples children are only recognized as being legal under State law. Parents sign away many rights to their own children by getting married by the State.

Why is a Common Law Marriage better than a State marriage?

• Because getting married is something personal between two people and should be kept that way.
• A marriage is based on customs and traditions of the family and the community and has nothing at all to do with the State.
• Another advantage of getting married under Common Law is that you are not bound by a religion.
• A Common law marriages is a legal marriage.

Malcolm McClure of UPMART talks about common law marriages during his UPMART Common Law Courses UCLC Please contact us on the UPMART website and book in for a course.

By not having a contract with the state it means that a child born from the union of a Common Law marriage that the State cannot claim an interest in the child via his or her birth certificate.

Please leave a comment on your views or an opinion you may have on a common law marriage.

Community Justice

Common Law is a human law.

There are three definitions of common law:

• That which derives its force and authority from the universal consent and immemorial practice of the community – Oxford English Dictionary.
• The unwritten law derived from the traditional law of England. – Ibid OED
• The unwritten law derived from the traditional law of England and as developed by judicial precedence, interpretation, expansion and modification: – Dietrich V R 1992 177 CLR 292

There is two ways laws are created: by the Parliament and by the people through common Law initiatives, petitions to Parliament, challenges in court, and referendum.

“Only the people can take away the common law right because the common law right is not owned by the Parliament, but by the people. The common law is therefore, self-evident” (Coco vs. The Queen, 1994. Butterworth’s Legal Dictionary, p 221)

Recently I had an opportunity to witness a fine example of common law in action in the community.

Living in the city for many years and not having a break away for a while I decided to go for a drive and spend time in the country. Left Sydney and headed north and when I reached Taree I decided to stop and have a look at the beach.

I drove to the access and parking area leading into the beach but did not drive in straight away. I couldn’t, because it was so busy with cars driving in and out. For an instant I was confused and thought this was incredibly unorganized.

Why did I think that? Because there were no arrows or “in” and “out” signs. I thought, how on earth could this happen? Taree council  must really be incompetent. I mean here it is…. and there are two driveways here. How am I supposed to know which one to use to drive in safely?

In actual fact it only took me a few seconds of observation to see how this complex system was working and without any council signs. The traffic although moving fast, was in a flow. They were all moving in one direction. One way in and one way out and operations running very smoothly.

At that moment I realized how simple the natural flow was and it was the natural thing to do. It felt good. It’s refreshing to see people using their own common sense while in control of a car. I realized that we didn’t need council signs to do our thinking for us. Not in the country anyway.

How could I have thought this parking spot in the bush was not manageable without council signs? I drove in feeling really good about my self that I had worked out the complex system without the aid of signs.

Common Law is Common Sense.

I stayed a short while enjoying the scenery before heading off. As I’m leaving I heard a loud voice calling out. I looked around to see that someone had driven their car in the wrong way. The traffic had jammed up and the cars wanting to leave could not because this car had come in the wrong way. He’s soon made aware by the community and I heard him say “there’s no signs” He was told “There’s no need for signs if you just look and use your common sense.

He was told how silly he is was for not observing the flow before entering in and disrupting the flow. I see this as a fine example of true common law in action. City dwellers can learn how to get in touch with this that they have lost. learn how to claim back human rights and much, much more by attending an UPMART Common Law Course (UCLC) . Learn the laws of the community that have been forgotten. It’s so simple but the example here demonstrates how the individual has lost their basic sense of direction in many simple everyday living activities. When this happens we then become vulnerable to abuse and to some silly statute laws that are made just to take our money. Especially for those people who live in the cities and the law was not meant for that.

Best regards,

Jill Brown.

P.S. If you like this post please  RSS

It appears Australia will soon be preparing for another Election.

Federal or State Election happen regularly in Australia. We hold one every 3 years or sooner is likely. The Politicians collect huge sums of money by holding Elections. Any wonder we have them so often? Voting is compulsory in Australia and fines apply for those who fail to vote. Also in N.S.W. and in other States, Queensland excluded the voter is responsible for voting in the Senate.  Senate Candidates can be as many as 60 or 70 people standing and each candidate needing to be numbered in preference order if voting below the line is preferred. Any mistake in numbering will cause the whole voting form for this vote to be declared an invalid vote.

It’s ironic

The ironic thing about Federal and State Elections in Australia is that before election day there is very little if any information available on candidates standing for election. On election day the potential voter,  “that’s all of us” heads towards the polling booth with all good intentions to vote in the right way at the ballot box. We will on the way most likely be rushed by polling booth workers. They line themselves outside the entrance and are wanting to thrust their particular brand of a How-To-Vote form in the hand of the potential voter. Each person also prefer to have their form sitting on top of the pile so that they have a better chance to receive the vote. The voter by now is clutching many pamphlets and guides on How-To-Vote holding candidate names and photos. Candidates are people that the voter does not recognize and does not know. Never-the-less the voter is expected to vote for a candidate and expected to allocate preferences to people they do not know. Sometimes the voter reaches a point where he decides not to vote for either one of the two major parties. He will soon realize though that his vote will in fact go to the two major party’s and against his will.

The voter on and before election day is faced with the situation of not knowing:

• Who the candidates are that are standing for the major parties
• How many independents are standing and what they stand for, or against
• Where are preferences going
  
• What are the policies of each candidate
• If there are any policies at all to consider
• Who’s standing against the sitting member in their own area
• Who’s standing in the Senate and for what party
• What candidate may be standing for a principle, etc.

The voter does however know one thing that is certain. That is that one of the two major parties will win the election. Lib or Lab will receive the vote even if it’s against the voters wishes. That is happening in Australian politics because the two major parties have the Preferential voting system structured to favour themselves to always win the election. The two major parties will also go into collusion if necessary to keep smaller parties and independents out of the running. This happened when Pauline Hanson’s One Nation (PHON) came along from 1997 to 2001. The two major parties went into collusion and kept PHON out of politics. That happened even though PHON had the majority of votes and voters wanted Pauline to be in politics. Now LibLab (they proved to be one party by keeping PHON out) has won they do not have to win the voter over by making policies and making promises. The monopoly now stands that LibLab are preferencing each other. A ploy to stay in leadership in Australian politics. Australian Politicians are no longer pressured to keep the voter happy. Once-upon-a-time politicians needed policies to attract the voter and now they don’t. They have now done away with making policies and the community as a whole suffers as a result. Results are a constant erosion of infrastructure and in important services in the community. The erosion of public hospital services is just one example that service structures in the community are declining.

My voting proposal is that voters unite to take back control of the vote.

My Proposal to take back control we the voter must unite and vote as one in an effort to win back power. The voter can make a difference by having a voting strategy such as this. We need to be able to pick off the two major party’s one by one. This voting strategy can cause favorable policies to once again be introduced that support the community.  My Proposal is to use the strategy that the voter needs to tackle each election as if in a situation similar to that as a WAR situation. A situation that one would face on the battle field. Federal and State elections are by all accounts similar to WAR situations! It’s not a war between the Lib’s and the Lab’s as they would have us believe or the super gullible may believe. It’s the situation of them against us – the voter against the Politician.

We the voter need to agree that voting for government is a WAR situation. We the voter must agree that in a war situation, an army if it’s to win would need to attack and defeat an enemy camp one at a time. It would be suicide to attack all the enemy at one time. Especially without the army having a plan of attack. We the voter in a similar situation must pick each political camp off one by one.  We the voter also needs to agree that in any war tactic the army must take out the strongest enemy camp first. Is this understood as a logical conclusion? An example could possibly be to ask the question: Why would the general weaken and to tire-out his army by first attacking the smaller groups when he still had the main and strongest enemy to defeat?

The strongest political party in Australia is the Party in power now and this Party has been the strongest political party for a long time in Australian politics. At present this political party is in power or in office if you like, in both Federal and State politics. My proposal will work if the majority of votes follow the voting rule of My Proposal. The voting rule is for the voter to unite and vote for one party at a time. The rule in My Proposal is to pick off and defeat each one of the two major parties one by one. Following the rule of My Proposal is that the voter will need to vote in the next election be it a Federal or State Election for the Liberal Party. The voter must also keep voting for the Liberal Party in every election until the Labor Party is gone and is begging for votes. As nasty as it may sound this strategy must be followed for the long term benefit of the community, the country and for the voter to win back the power in the election war.

To get the message of My Voting Proposal across to the voting majority and to agree will be the hardest challenge.

Especially hard when the major party’s have such a stronghold on the voting system in Australia. I may hear someone say at this point, “What about the Greens, why not vote for The Greens?” For My Proposal to work the vote can not go to the Greens. One reason is that Greens preferences ALWAYS and that is ALWAYS goes to the Labor Party. That is always and no matter what the policies may be or if they do not agree on policies. The Libs are next in line for elimination. They the 2nd biggest party to contend with so once the strongest is defeated they will need to be the next target. Then we may vote for the Greens. I may also hear someone saying at this point, “Won’t this make an equally strong party of the Greens for the voter to contend with?” It may for a while but the difference is that the voter will be in control of the voting system. Also if My Proposal is implemented the Preferential Voting System could possibly be used as originally intended to be used. Without corruption preferences are good tools for the voter to use.

When My Voting Proposal starts to take effect the smaller parties and the independents may see a change taking place. As a result My Proposal could cause candidates who want the vote or who are after preferences to start making proper preference deals. Possibly My Proposal will also bring back favourable policies that will WIN the voter over.

Power To The Voter, by using My Voting Proposal!

Thank You.

Jill Brown.